Copyright holders are aware, or should be, that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) allows them to issue a takedown notice to a website,
essentially forcing the website to remove allegedly infringing material from the site. To be effective, however, the takedown notice must
comply with the requirements set forth in the DMCA, one of which is the inclusion of "[a] statement that the complaining party has a good faith
belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law." 17 U.S.C. §
512(c)(3)(A). A federal court recently interpreted this requirement and held that to validly claim a good faith belief that use of material is
not authorized by law, a copyright holder must consider whether use of the material constitutes fair use. See Lenz v. Universal Music
Corporation, 572 F.Supp. 2d 1150, 1154-55 (N.D. Cal. 2008).
Lenz arose after the plaintiff, Stephanie Lenz, posted a video on YouTube of her baby dancing to the Prince song "Let's Go Crazy." To
access the video, CLICK HERE. After Lenz posted the video,
Universal sent YouTube a takedown notice pursuant to Section 512(c) of the DMCA. YouTube promptly removed the video and sent Lenz an email
notifying her that it had done so in response to Universal's accusation that the video infringed Universal's copyright in the Prince song.
Lenz then sent YouTube a DMCA counter-notification demanding that the video be re-posted because she claimed that the video constituted fair
use of the song and, thus, did not infringe Universal's copyright. Lenz also brought suit against Universal claiming, among other things, that
Universal's takedown notice constituted a misrepresentation under Section 512(f) because it was "obvious" that the video constituted a fair use
of "Let's Go Crazy." Therefore, Universal did not have a good faith belief that use of the song in Lenz's video was not authorized by law.
See 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A).
The court agreed with Lenz and her dancing baby. The court interpreted "authorized by law" to mean an activity that is "permitted by law or not
contrary to law." Id. Based on this definition, even if the fair use doctrine only excuses copyright infringement, as Universal
contended, it was still a lawful use of a copyright (see 17 U.S.C. § 107) and, therefore, authorized by law. Id. According
to the Lenz court, this means that fair use must be considered in order to validly claim a good faith belief that use of material was not
authorized by law. Id. As a result, Lenz's allegation that Universal acted in bad faith by issuing a takedown notice without proper
consideration of the fair use doctrine stated a valid claim, and Universal's motion to dismiss was therefore denied. Id. at 1155.
What Lenz Means For Copyright Holders
The Lenz decision probably has less impact on copyright holders than one might first suspect. To be sure, in light of Lenz,
copyright holders should consider fair use before sending a DMCA takedown notice. Copyright holders may want to reconsider policies or
procedures that call for the issuance of takedown notices merely because unauthorized copyrighted material is found on a website. In other
words, automatic takedown notice policies that don't allow for fair use consideration present some risk of liability under Section 512(f) –
at least in light of the Lenz decision.
Lenz does not, however, imply that copyright owners must come to the correct decision about whether use of material constitutes fair use
or even that they must carefully consider the fair use issue. In fact, the Lenz court noted that "there are likely to be few
[instances] in which a copyright owner's determination that a particular use is not fair use will meet the requisite subjective bad faith
required to prevail in an action for misrepresentation under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f)." Id. at 1155 (citations omitted). Thus,
copyright owners should make a determination that use of material is not fair use, but such a determination may not necessarily have to be
correct.
For questions regarding the DMCA, fair use, or other issues affecting the protection of copyright on the internet, please contact
Jeremy T. Brown at
jtbrown@jw.com.
If you wish to be added to this e-Alert listing, please
SIGN UP HERE. If you wish to be removed, please reply to this e-mail with REMOVE in the subject line and include your first and last name.
