Health Header
March 18, 2011
Resources

JW Health Care Practice Area

JW Health Care Attorneys

JW HealthBrief Newsletter

Contact JW

www.jw.com

Offices

100 Congress Avenue
Suite 1100
Austin, TX  78701

901 Main Street
Suite 6000
Dallas, TX  75202

777 Main Street
Suite 2100
Fort Worth, TX  76102

1401 McKinney Street
Suite 1900
Houston, TX  77010

301 W. Beauregard Avenue
Suite 200
San Angelo, TX  76903

112 E. Pecan Street
Suite 2400
San Antonio, TX  78205 
EEOC: Hospital Cannot Refuse to Hire "Latex Glove Allergic" Employees


By Lionel M. Schooler and Jed Morrison

Just when you thought you had heard it all when it comes to discrimination claims, it has been recently reported that a California hospital system settled a discrimination suit involving their refusal to hire workers who were severely allergic to latex. The suit was originally filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

John Muir Health, which admitted no liability in the settlement, is paying about $340,000 to resolve the monetary damages component, and further agreeing to special procedures in its hiring practices to resolve the procedures component of the case.  The EEOC claimed that John Muir's campuses in Walnut Creek and Concord, California, in 2004 refused to hire seven nurses and one lab technician who were believed to have had severe latex allergies that prevented them from working at the facilities.  The individuals' offers of employment were withdrawn after independent doctors hired to conduct pre-employment screening determined that the applicants had severe latex allergies.

Under the settlement consent decree, which was approved March 15, 2011, by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, John Muir agreed to (i) pay $340,000 to be apportioned among the named individuals whose employment offers were rescinded; (ii) devise new policies regarding applicants and employees; (iii) develop training for determining whether a latex-related work restriction can be accommodated; and (iv) train managers in a process to prevent discrimination.

In addition, new-hire candidates or employees who test positive for latex allergy shall now be referred to an allergist, paid by the hospital, who shall determine what workplace restrictions, if any, are recommended.

Consider yourself warned!  Although the settlement is only binding on the parties to that case, hospitals (and presumably other EEOC-covered health care entities) should take precautions to not just automatically refuse to hire "latex allergic" job applicants.

For more information, contact Lonnie Schooler at lschooler@jw.com or 713.752.4516 or Jed Morrison at jmorrison@jw.com or 210.978.7780.


If you wish to be added to this e-Alert listing, please SIGN UP HERE. If you wish to follow the JW Health Care group on Twitter, please CLICK HERE.

Austin

Dallas

Fort Worth

Houston

San Angelo

San Antonio

Jackson Walker L.L.P.

Health e-Alert is published by the law firm of Jackson Walker L.L.P. to inform readers of relevant information in health care law and related areas. It is not intended nor should it be used as a substitute for legal advice or opinion which can be rendered only when related to specific fact situations. For more information, please call 1.866.922.5559 or visit us at www.jw.com.

©2011 Jackson Walker L.L.P.

Click here to unsubscribe your e-mail address
901 Main Street, Suite 6000 | Dallas, Texas 75202